- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:58:19 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2007 10:45:59 UTC
/ Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say: | A.2 Optional Steps: To get to Rec. quicker, I suggest we make this section | non-normative, or cut it out altogether, and produce a separate document that | defines sets of optional steps. I think it's usefully separable: we won't want | to update XProc in order to add new optional steps, for example. Yes, I'd be happy to move the optional steps to a WG Note, I guess. On a related note, I think maybe we should move the standard steps "up" to Section 6 instead of an appendix. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Any bureaucracy reorganized to enhance http://nwalsh.com/ | efficiency is indistinguishable from | its predecessor.
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2007 10:45:59 UTC