- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:32:14 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:32:21 UTC
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: | I think strongly that wrap sequence should take sequence as input and | output sequence also... I've got mixed feelings about this one. On the one hand, the whole point of wrap-sequence is that it takes a sequence, puts a wrapper around it, and produces a single document. On the other hand, with group-adjacent, if we say that it can produce a sequence, the results are pretty obvoius. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A great deal may be done by severity, http://nwalsh.com/ | more by love, but most by clear | discernment and impartial | justice.--Goethe
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:32:21 UTC