- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:22:14 +0200
- To: "Alex Milowski" <alex@milowski.org>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
I think we should at least say that the resolution of name would be consistent through all the pipeline (I say the resolution, not the result of the get) That means : If I have a "toto.xml" in the xinclude and a "toto.xml" in the in a p:document and a "toto.xml" in the doc() function of my xslt what can I expect ? > Is there a basic use case that you want to see covered? Maybe we can step > back a bit and see if there is something we do need to do in V1. Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:22:37 UTC