- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:51:28 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87hco3z1rz.fsf@nwalsh.com>
As currently specified, I don't understand what wrap-sequence does.
Given:
<p:wrap-sequence>
<p:input port="source">
<p:inline><doc label="a"/></p:inline>
<p:inline><doc label="a"/></p:inline>
<p:inline><doc label="b"/></p:inline>
<p:inline><doc label="a"/></p:inline>
</p:input>
<p:option name="wrapper" value="wrapme"/>
</p:wrap-sequence>
I think the output is:
<wrapme>
<doc label="a"/>
<doc label="a"/>
<doc label="b"/>
<doc label="a"/>
</wrapme>
What is the output of
<p:wrap-sequence>
<p:input port="source">
<p:inline><doc label="a"/></p:inline>
<p:inline><doc label="a"/></p:inline>
<p:inline><doc label="b"/></p:inline>
<p:inline><doc label="a"/></p:inline>
</p:input>
<p:option name="wrapper" value="wrapme"/>
<p:option name="group-adjacent" value="@label='a'"/>
</p:wrap-sequence>
Don't we need another wrapper element?
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The firmest line that can be drawn upon
http://nwalsh.com/ | the smoothest paper is still jagged
| edges if seen through a microscope.
| This does not matter until important
| deductions are made on the supposition
| that there are no jagged edges.--Samuel
| Butler (II)
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 11:51:49 UTC