- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:51:28 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87hco3z1rz.fsf@nwalsh.com>
As currently specified, I don't understand what wrap-sequence does. Given: <p:wrap-sequence> <p:input port="source"> <p:inline><doc label="a"/></p:inline> <p:inline><doc label="a"/></p:inline> <p:inline><doc label="b"/></p:inline> <p:inline><doc label="a"/></p:inline> </p:input> <p:option name="wrapper" value="wrapme"/> </p:wrap-sequence> I think the output is: <wrapme> <doc label="a"/> <doc label="a"/> <doc label="b"/> <doc label="a"/> </wrapme> What is the output of <p:wrap-sequence> <p:input port="source"> <p:inline><doc label="a"/></p:inline> <p:inline><doc label="a"/></p:inline> <p:inline><doc label="b"/></p:inline> <p:inline><doc label="a"/></p:inline> </p:input> <p:option name="wrapper" value="wrapme"/> <p:option name="group-adjacent" value="@label='a'"/> </p:wrap-sequence> Don't we need another wrapper element? Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The firmest line that can be drawn upon http://nwalsh.com/ | the smoothest paper is still jagged | edges if seen through a microscope. | This does not matter until important | deductions are made on the supposition | that there are no jagged edges.--Samuel | Butler (II)
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 11:51:49 UTC