- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:42:13 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Norman Walsh writes:
> HST writes:
> | Is the following a correct summary of what's intended:
> |
> | 1) ignore-prefixes may appear on p:pipeline or p:pipeline-library;
>
> Right.
>
> | 2) elements in namespaces declared as ignorable (_ignorable
> | elements_) may appear only as the children of containers (and
> | p:pipeline-library?);
>
> Right.
In the RelaxNG grammar as published, in fact _ignorable elements_ are
only allowed in subpipelines. In the DTD as published, they are only
allowed in the prologue of p:pipeline and p:pipeline-library. I guess
_neither_ of these is correct, but what _is_ correct?
Despite the trickiness of defining this, I think it really should be
"as a child of container elements, or of p:pipeline-library, at _any_
position". I'm going to rewrite the DTD and XSDL schema to implement
this.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGlMIZkjnJixAXWBoRAonJAJ9z6qV78Qut+dieGIFC92A0YFUsDwCeLLbg
Qfg52wP4Pqr2N8OOVyqvwF8=
=g4EW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2007 11:42:29 UTC