Re: A generalisation of delete and unwrap from Richard Tobin on 2007-01-24 (public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org from January 2007)

From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:59:08 +0000 (GMT)
To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20070124165908.9A79019CBA4@macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk>

> / Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk> was heard to say:
> | Delete and unwrap could be subsumed by a more general "replace"

> They could, but I'm inclined not to. I think it'll be easier for users
> to understand if we have three simple components rather than one=20
> more complex one.

I was not proposing it seriously as an alternative component, but to
help with understanding the range of functions.

-- Richard

Received on Wednesday, 24 January 2007 16:56:30 UTC