- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:10:37 +0100
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
First quick thoughts for boostrap... Yeh, I crossed this one on my road, but didn't stop on...may be I should have... First in the current spec XProc [[ XPathExpression, XSLTMatchPattern: As a string per [W3C XML Schema: Part 2], including whitespace normalization, and the further requirement to be a conformant Expression per [XPath 1.0] or [XPath 2.0], as appropriate, or Match pattern per [XSLT 1.0], respectively ]] So we overlooked the XSLT 2.0 Pattern everywhere in the document We should mention somewhere anyway what is the dynamic and static context for this Pattern evaluation (since reference to function are possible and reference to variable are possible in XSLT 2.0 Pattern and namespace context etc..) We should also mention what rule we follow? May be we should follow XSLT 2.0 rules : XSLT 2.0 [[ 5.5.4 Errors in Patterns Any dynamic error or type error that occurs during the evaluation of a pattern against a particular node is treated as a recoverable error even if the error would not be recoverable under other circumstances. The optional recovery action is to treat the pattern as not matching that node. ]] Mohamed On Dec 11, 2007 4:23 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > I assume that if xpath-version=2 is requested, then the XSLTMatchPatterns > also allow XPath 2.0 functions. Do we have to say anything else? Can > someone take a peek at the definition of XSLTMatchPattern in XSLT 2.0 and see > if it looks problematic? > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Do not seek to follow in the footsteps > http://nwalsh.com/ | of men of old; seek what they > | sought.--Matsuo Basho > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2007 06:10:56 UTC