- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:42:27 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2bqcr626k.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: | Ok I find a way to do it | | <p:viewport match="div"> | <p:group> | <p:ouput port="current-bis"/> | <p:log port="current-bis"/> | <p:identity/> | </p:group> | rest of the subpipeline | </p:viewport> | | May be a bit tortuous, isn'it ? I dunno. How often is log going to get used in a production pipeline? The alternative, I guess, would be to allow p:log to point to any readable port in addition to/instead of an output port. That could be kind of tricky for some implementations (like my own :-) where it's inconvenient to read a single instance of an input port more than once. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Part of thinking is its cruelty, aside http://nwalsh.com/ | from its contents. It is the process of | detachment from everything else, the | ripping, the wrenching, the sharpness | of cutting.--Elias Canetti
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2007 16:42:44 UTC