- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:42:27 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2bqcr626k.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| Ok I find a way to do it
|
| <p:viewport match="div">
| <p:group>
| <p:ouput port="current-bis"/>
| <p:log port="current-bis"/>
| <p:identity/>
| </p:group>
| rest of the subpipeline
| </p:viewport>
|
| May be a bit tortuous, isn'it ?
I dunno. How often is log going to get used in a production pipeline?
The alternative, I guess, would be to allow p:log to point to any
readable port in addition to/instead of an output port. That could be
kind of tricky for some implementations (like my own :-) where it's
inconvenient to read a single instance of an input port more than
once.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Part of thinking is its cruelty, aside
http://nwalsh.com/ | from its contents. It is the process of
| detachment from everything else, the
| ripping, the wrenching, the sharpness
| of cutting.--Elias Canetti
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2007 16:42:44 UTC