Re: Comments on August 10 editors' draft through section 2.6

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Norman Walsh writes:

> | 2.3 Primary Inputs and Outputs:
> |
> |  I'm not happy that the definitions of primary i/o are contractdicted
> |  by the prose which immediately follows.  I suggest they be rewritten
> |  along the following lines:
>
> I like your proposed text, but I don't see any contradiction in what
> follows. Clue, please?

Um, some misunderstandings, too much water under the bridge, the net
result, i.e. the prose in the 22 Aug. draft, is fine.

> |  Overall, I am a bit worried about the bulleted lists here, as they
> |  are not all exactly right -- perhaps at the end of the section we
> |  could add something such as
>
> Where is "here"?

Oops -- back towards the end of 2.2.  They are closer to correct now,
I guess this has been overtaken. . .

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGzZlJkjnJixAXWBoRApBJAJ9ujABgMxR/plRgRaGYJ/R/xjn/ywCeOaJE
UNmrqNebmGeay/H6T0k3Ssk=
=H29Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Thursday, 23 August 2007 14:27:42 UTC