Re: New draft: 10 Aug

/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| On 8/21/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
|> Alex, please make sure you look for comments to you!
|>
|> | Also don't we need the xmlns() scheme for resolving pipeline inside p:librairy ?
|>
|> I don't think so, names are always NCNames.
|
| ?? Inside p:librairy ?? I knew that inside p:pipeline all is NCName
| but p:pipelineS are QNames in p:librairy, right ?

No, that's what all that namespace magic is for on p:pipeline-library.
But really, users are going to ignore all that and use type, I think.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | DNA neither cares nor knows. DNA just
http://nwalsh.com/            | is. And we dance to its music.--Richard
                              | Dawkins