- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:49:14 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 8/8/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > | I still do prefer to replace > | <p:option name="recursive" value="no"/> > | > | by > | <p:option name="recursion-level" value="0"/> > > In the 2 Aug minutes, we decided to leave out *both* recursion *and* a > depth for V1. Alex, what motivated you to put them back? > That's just a cut-n-paste error. The option shouldn't be there as the text forbids doing recursion. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2007 16:49:17 UTC