- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:21:53 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- CC: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Message-ID: <87lkcsmyni.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say: | In 5.7.1.3 Assigning Values to Options, and 5.7.2 p:parameter Element, | a reference to the general rules about establishing the XPath context | (in 2.8) would be useful. Some of the description could then be | removed. Right. | 5.7.3 Option and Parameter Namespace Bindings should be amalgamated | with the relevant part of 2.8. It would be good to mention the | possibility of option/parameter values coming from a (configuration) | document, and to suggest that implementations use the namespaces from | that document. (In other words, if the select expression actually | selects a *node*, then the in-scope namespaces from that node should | be used.) I think this is an area where we don't really have a clear understanding of how things are supposed to work. Could you construct a couple of (reasonably) small examples and describe how you think the namespace bindings should be computed? Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A man should have any number of little http://nwalsh.com/ | aims about which he should be conscious | and for which he should have names, but | he should have neither name for, nor | consciousness concerning, the main aim | of his life.--Samuel Butler (II)
Received on Friday, 3 August 2007 15:22:22 UTC