- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:58:21 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87d4y7gsbm.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: | Don't misunderstand me, I'm still not talking about semantics, but | about concepts | | I wanted to have some tought on obscure concept so as to be sure of | what is out of reach of V1, what we should be prepared to for V.next | and how to not put thing that would make us trouble with such | "polymorphic" thing I'm sorry, I must be particularly slow today. I have no idea what you mean. If we have a p:web-services step, it has to *mean* something. If we don't know what it means in V1, we can leave it out. I'd rather not spend time considering obscure concepts for V1 ;-) Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | To probe a hole we first use a straight http://nwalsh.com/ | stick to see how far it takes us. To | probe the visible world we use the | assumption that things are simple until | they prove to be otherwise.--E. H. | Gombrich
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2007 15:58:27 UTC