Friday, 31 August 2007
Thursday, 30 August 2007
- Re: Unserializable documents
- Unserializable documents
- XProc Minutes 30 Aug 2007
- Re: Graphical proposal
- Re: Graphical proposal
- Re: Graphical proposal
- Re: Graphical proposal
- Graphical proposal
Wednesday, 29 August 2007
- Re: Some editorial changes in Section 7
- Re: Some editorial changes in Section 7
- Re: Some editorial changes in Section 7
- [From Norm] Editorial changes to Part 7
- Some editorial changes in Section 7
- Re: Face-to-face meeting at the upcoming technical plenary
- RE: Face-to-face meeting at the upcoming technical plenary
- Face-to-face meeting at the upcoming technical plenary
- Re: Updated editor's draft: 29 Aug 2007
- Re: QName as a defined term
- Re: Updated editor's draft: 29 Aug 2007
- Re: QName as a defined term
- Re: EXI comments: Deprecate plugabble CODECs for general use
- RE: EXI comments: Deprecate plugabble CODECs for general use
- Re: EXI comments: Deprecate plugabble CODECs for general use
- EXI comments: Deprecate plugabble CODECs for general use
- XProc Agenda 30 Aug 2007
- Updated editor's draft: 29 Aug 2007
- Re: New "New" draft: 22 Aug 2007
- Re: QName as a defined term
- Re: QName as a defined term
- Re: multiple subpipelines : how to count the number of outputs ?
- Re: New "New" draft: 22 Aug 2007
- Re: QName as a defined term
- Re: QName as a defined term
- Re: New "New" draft: 22 Aug 2007
- Re: New "New" draft: 22 Aug 2007
- QName as a defined term
- Re: Comments on August 22 editors' draft from section 2.8 through 4.2
- Re: Comments on August 22 editors' draft from section 4.3 through 7 intro
- Re: p:when : what if it not a valid XPath
- Re: General errors. . .
Tuesday, 28 August 2007
- Re: p:when : what if it not a valid XPath
- Re: Comments on August 22 editors' draft from section 2.8 through 4.2
- Re: Comments on August 22 editors' draft from section 4.3 through 7 intro
- Re: Comments on August 22 editors' draft from section 2.8 through 4.2
- Re: Comments on August 22 editors' draft from section 4.3 through 7 intro
- Re: p:when : what if it not a valid XPath
- Re: p:when : what if it not a valid XPath
- Re: p:log is too restrictive
- Re: p:log is too restrictive
- p:when : what if it not a valid XPath
- p:log is too restrictive
- General errors. . .
- Re: Comments on August 22 editors' draft from section 4.3 through 7 intro
- Re: Comments on August 22 editors' draft from section 2.8 through 4.2
- Re: http-request
Monday, 27 August 2007
- New draft: 27 Aug 2007
- Re: Comments on August 22 editors' draft from section 4.3 through 7 intro
- Re: Comments on August 22 editors' draft from section 2.8 through 4.2
- Re: Option types
- http-request
- Comments on August 22 editors' draft from section 4.3 through 7 intro
Friday, 24 August 2007
Thursday, 23 August 2007
- Re: Typing of options and parameters
- Re: Typing of options and parameters
- Re: Typing of options and parameters
- Typing of options and parameters
- XProc Minutes 23 Aug 2007
- Re: New "New" draft: 22 Aug 2007
- Comments on August 22 editors' draft from section 2.8 through 4.2
- Re: Comments on August 10 editors' draft through section 2.6
Wednesday, 22 August 2007
- Re: New draft: 10 Aug
- Re: New "New" draft: 22 Aug 2007
- New "New" draft: 22 Aug 2007
- Re: Comments on August 10 editors' draft through section 2.6
- Re: New draft: 10 Aug
- Re: New draft: 10 Aug
- XProc Agenda 23 Aug 2007
Tuesday, 21 August 2007
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Re: Comments on August 10 editors' draft through section 2.6
- New draft: 21 Aug 2007
- Re: New draft: 10 Aug
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Re: New draft: 10 Aug
- Re: New draft: 10 Aug
- Re: First stab at p:namespaces
- Re: First stab at p:namespaces
- Re: First stab at p:namespaces
Monday, 20 August 2007
Saturday, 18 August 2007
Friday, 17 August 2007
- Re: Default values for options
- First stab at p:namespaces
- Re: Default values for options
- Re: Default values for options
- Re: Default values for options
- Re: Default values for options
Thursday, 16 August 2007
- Re: Default values for options
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Re: Default values for options
- Re: Default values for options
- Re: Default values for options
- Default values for options
- XProc Minutes 16 Aug 2007
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Comments on August 10 editors' draft through section 2.6
- Re: XProc Agenda 16 Aug 2007
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Re: Namespace bindings
Wednesday, 15 August 2007
- Re: Namespace bindings
- Re: Namespace bindings
- Re: Namespace bindings
- XProc Agenda 16 Aug 2007
- Re: Namespace bindings
- Re: Namespace bindings
Tuesday, 14 August 2007
- Re: Namespace bindings
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
Monday, 13 August 2007
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Re: New draft: 10 Aug
Friday, 10 August 2007
- Re: New draft: 10 Aug
- Re: multiple subpipelines : how to count the number of outputs ?
- New draft: 10 Aug
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Re: Last call draft?
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Re: Last call draft?
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Re: Last call draft?
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 3.2 Comments
- Re: multiple subpipelines : how to count the number of outputs ?
- Re: multiple subpipelines : how to count the number of outputs ?
- multiple subpipelines : how to count the number of outputs ?
- Re: Defaulting pipeline inputs and outputs
- Re: Defaulting pipeline inputs and outputs
- Re: Defaulting pipeline inputs and outputs
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Re: Defaulting pipeline inputs and outputs
- Re: The p:pack step
Thursday, 9 August 2007
- Re: The p:pack step
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Re: Defaulting pipeline inputs and outputs
- Re: Defaulting pipeline inputs and outputs
- Re: Namespace bindings
- Re: Defaulting pipeline inputs and outputs
- Defaulting pipeline inputs and outputs
- The p:pack step
- Re: Namespace bindings
- XProc Minutes 9 Aug 2007
Wednesday, 8 August 2007
- Re: a column major packing component
- Re: Defaulting pipeline inputs
- Re: a column major packing component
- Re: Remarks on p:directory-list
- Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 6 August 2007
- Re: Remarks on p:directory-list
- Defaulting pipeline inputs
- Re: a column major packing component
- Remarks on p:directory-list
- a column major packing component
- XProc Agenda 9 Aug 2007
Tuesday, 7 August 2007
- Re: MIME type and fragid syntax?
- Anonymous steps or defaulted names?
- MIME type and fragid syntax?
- Re: Namespace bindings
- Re: Forward references
- Re: Namespace bindings
- Re: Forward references
Monday, 6 August 2007
- Re: Namespace bindings
- Re: Forward references
- Re: Namespace bindings
- Re: Forward references
- Namespace bindings
- Forward references
- New draft
Saturday, 4 August 2007
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 3.2 Comments
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 3.2 Comments
Friday, 3 August 2007
- Re: Last call draft?
- RE: Last call draft?
- Last call draft?
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 17 July 2007
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 17 July 2007
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 17 July 2007
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 3.2 Comments
- Re: Output of p:validate-xml-schema
- Re: unnamed ports
- Re: Typo
- Re: Unconnected primary output port
- Re: Compound step terminology (editorial)
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 5.7 Comments
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 5.5 Comments
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 4.2 Comments
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 4.2 Comments
Thursday, 2 August 2007
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 5.1 Comments
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 4.6 Comments
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 3.2 Comments
- XProc Minutes 2 August 2007
- Re: Defaulting step and port on p:pipe
- Re: Simple question about web services
Wednesday, 1 August 2007
- Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 17 July 2007
- Updated XProc draft
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 3.2 Comments
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 4.4 Comments
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 4.2 Comments
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 4.2 Comments
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 4.1 Comments
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 3.6 Comments
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 3.4 Comments
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 2.3 Comments
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 2.8 Comments
- Re: a component with * inputs
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 2.7 Comments
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 3.2 Comments
- Re: a component with * inputs
- Re: XProc Editors Draft 2007-07-19: Section 3.2 Comments
- Re: XProc Agenda 2 August 2007
- Re: a component with * inputs
- Re: p:directory step
- Re: p:directory step
- Re: Defaulting step and port on p:pipe
- Re: p:directory step
- Re: a component with * inputs
- Re: We need something to generate a document from an option or a p:* function
- Re: p:directory step
- Re: XProc Agenda 2 August 2007
- Re: Simple question about web services
- Re: Defaulting step and port on p:pipe
- XProc Agenda 2 August 2007
- Re: a component with * inputs
- Re: Simple question about web services
- Defaulting step and port on p:pipe
- Re: Simple question about web services
- Re: p:directory step
- Re: a component with * inputs
- Re: Simple question about web services
- Re: Simple question about web services
- Re: a component with * inputs
- Re: Simple question about web services
- Re: a component with * inputs
- Re: Simple question about web services