- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:09:37 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 30 April 2007 21:09:44 UTC
Unlike validation, XSLT 2.0, XQuery, and XSL FO processing, which all carry a fairly large implementation burden, p:http-request seems fairly lightweight. (I haven't implemented it yet, so I can still say this with a clear conscience :-) Furthermore, it seems like the sort of thing that could make for really interesting and useful pipelines. It'd be a shame if it wasn't interoperable. I propose that we move it to the "required" pile. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A man can believe a considerable deal http://nwalsh.com/ | of rubbish, and yet go about his daily | work in a rational and cheerful | manner.--Norman Douglas
Received on Monday, 30 April 2007 21:09:44 UTC