- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:54:59 -0700
- To: "XProc WG" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 30 April 2007 20:55:03 UTC
On 4/30/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote: > > hum...but how do you define a new step with the ability to contain > subpipelines then ? That you can't do. You'd need a non-interoperable extension element to do that. It would be interesting to have a macro-like facility for this. I can't see trying to tackle that in this version of the specification. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Monday, 30 April 2007 20:55:03 UTC