- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:20:35 +0200
- To: "Alex Milowski" <alex@milowski.org>
- Cc: "XProc WG" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 4/30/07, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> wrote: > > > On 4/30/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear, > > > > We already have p:validate-xml-schema and p:validate-relax-ng > > > > It seems we still miss at least two of existing more or less > > widespread technology : > > * p:validate-schematron > > > I think we don't have a schematron step for the same reason we don't > have a p:tagsoup or p:tidy for cleaning up HTML. They are open-source > projects and not specifications. Ughhhh ! It's an ISO Specification since 2004 !! http://dsdl.org/0524.pdf > > Many of the schematron features will be available in XML Schema 1.1. > > > * p:nvdl > > > I had thought the NVDL folks were hoping to implement NVDL as an > XML pipeline. I'm not sure it's an easy task > Is there a final spec for NVDL ? http://www.nvdl.org/ a ISO standard since 2006 > If not, I think we need > to wait for one before we can put it into our spec. To be fair, one half of the requirements is a standard (the validation part), but not the recombine part > > None of this precludes there being a "standard" definition of steps > outside of our current Version 1 specification. In fact, I'd be an advocate > of producing an ancillary specification that defines additional step > types at some point in the future (i.e. after our current specification goes > to > rec). > Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Monday, 30 April 2007 16:20:43 UTC