- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:22:13 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 28 April 2007 12:22:27 UTC
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: | Since we lack conditionnal in xpath, I propose to add a custom XProc | function "p:if(conditional;then;else)" I'd rather not. Like Henry said, the one use case we can't handle is likely to be pretty marginal and you can always do it with an XSLT step if you need it. I don't think the cost of making all implementors support an extension function is justified by the benefit of handling that one use case. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The stone fell on the pitcher? Woe to http://nwalsh.com/ | the pitcher. The pitcher fell on the | stone? Woe to the pitcher.--Rabbinic | Saying
Received on Saturday, 28 April 2007 12:22:27 UTC