- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:14:28 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I realised, courtesy of a brief conversation with Richard just now, what's really bothering me: microcomponents are intended, as their name suggests, to be lightweight both technically and conceptually. I want to be able to explain each of them in under a minute. Match patterns are simpler to write, read and understand, and I value that simplicity and I think our users will also. In other words, I think this is an 80-20 argument -- only a small number of tricky cases will require 'select' semantics -- if you need that additional power for a tricky case, write an XSLT step. ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGMM/kkjnJixAXWBoRAnuTAJ9lAhQPfAUEzH45Wftw4hT5wLUVNgCeIz9u mdv3eKUnG08Rdbtob99xZT8= =oZWz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2007 16:14:48 UTC