- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:14:28 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I realised, courtesy of a brief conversation with Richard just now,
what's really bothering me: microcomponents are intended, as their
name suggests, to be lightweight both technically and conceptually. I
want to be able to explain each of them in under a minute. Match
patterns are simpler to write, read and understand, and I value that
simplicity and I think our users will also.
In other words, I think this is an 80-20 argument -- only a small
number of tricky cases will require 'select' semantics -- if you need
that additional power for a tricky case, write an XSLT step.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGMM/kkjnJixAXWBoRAnuTAJ9lAhQPfAUEzH45Wftw4hT5wLUVNgCeIz9u
mdv3eKUnG08Rdbtob99xZT8=
=oZWz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2007 16:14:48 UTC