- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:29:08 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87d51snqp7.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say: | I just find the distinction between arguments that are known in | advance and arguments that aren't known in advance much clearer than | trying to work out whether an argument is used *to*configure* a step | or used *by* a step. To recap: - Options are what you pass to a pipeline, they're in the environment, they can be shadowed, and you can refer to them with XPath expressions (i.e., $option). Basically, they're what parameters are in the current draft. :-) - You can also pass parameters to a pipeline, but the pipeline author isn't expected to know the names of the pipelines in advance. You can't refer to them with XPath expressions, $param is an error. Should they be passed around like options, in the environment, capable of being scoped, etc? I think I'm just about convinced. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Whatever else we are intended to do, we http://nwalsh.com/ | are not intended to succeed: failure is | the fate allotted.--Robert Louis | Stevenson
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 20:29:14 UTC