- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:22:28 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87irblspx7.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> was heard to say: | I think we *should* support text output as well, in exactly the same | way, although this would require us to support documents that aren't | well-formed XML documents (since they don't have a document element) | flowing through the pipeline. If we don't want to go there, a minor | change to the stylesheets producing text (adding a document element) | will make them amenable to this processing. I don't view this as | particularly burdensome for users. We could add an option to our xslt components that specifies the content should be wrapped with c:document. That would have the effect of making text output valid XML. I don't know if the wrapper should be conditional on the output method being text or not. I'm inclined to say not. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Whatever you may be sure of, be sure of http://nwalsh.com/ | this: that you are dreadfully like | other people.--James Russell Lowell
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 16:22:32 UTC