- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:18:47 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87zm538fag.fsf@nwalsh.com>
There's no way to expect complete uniformity of error reporting across all steps, so I don't think we should try to make the error reporting vocabulary very complicated. I propose: <err:errors name="stepname" type="p:steptype"> <error code="pfx:localname"> any wf content </error> </errors> Consider the following step: <p:xslt name="foo"> <p:input port="stylesheet"><p:document href="style.xsl"/></p:input> </p:xslt> If the style.xsl file fails because of the followng xsl:message <xsl:message terminate="yes"> <xsl:text>You blew it, </xsl:text> <xsl:value-of select="$user"/> </xsl:message> The step might generate the following errors: <err:errors name="foo" type="p:xslt"> <error code="p:error">You blew it, kid</error> </err:errors> Where "p:error" is the error code for "general error". Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | There is always some accident in the http://nwalsh.com/ | best of things, whether thoughts or | expressions or deeds. The memorable | thought, the happy expression, the | admirable deed are only partly | yours.--Henry David Thoreau
Received on Friday, 20 April 2007 11:19:01 UTC