- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:18:47 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87zm538fag.fsf@nwalsh.com>
There's no way to expect complete uniformity of error reporting across
all steps, so I don't think we should try to make the error reporting
vocabulary very complicated.
I propose:
<err:errors name="stepname" type="p:steptype">
<error code="pfx:localname">
any wf content
</error>
</errors>
Consider the following step:
<p:xslt name="foo">
<p:input port="stylesheet"><p:document href="style.xsl"/></p:input>
</p:xslt>
If the style.xsl file fails because of the followng xsl:message
<xsl:message terminate="yes">
<xsl:text>You blew it, </xsl:text>
<xsl:value-of select="$user"/>
</xsl:message>
The step might generate the following errors:
<err:errors name="foo" type="p:xslt">
<error code="p:error">You blew it, kid</error>
</err:errors>
Where "p:error" is the error code for "general error".
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | There is always some accident in the
http://nwalsh.com/ | best of things, whether thoughts or
| expressions or deeds. The memorable
| thought, the happy expression, the
| admirable deed are only partly
| yours.--Henry David Thoreau
Received on Friday, 20 April 2007 11:19:01 UTC