- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:28:35 +0100
- To: "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Jeni Tennison" <jeni@jenitennison.com>, public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Innovimax SARL writes:
> But are we going to tell to people that already have crafted their
> foo2csv or foo2html xslt stylesheet, that if they want to put it into
> XProc, they won't be able to do that ?
Yes. The cost in complexity throughout the spec. of supporting two
kinds of flows is just way out of proportion to the benefit in the few
cases where non-XML output is really required.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGJKFTkjnJixAXWBoRAsHmAJ9rz6Ou414n4J0guOvdKrDoJ2NFZACfU7HO
NSxgNxnmBrpkZkhAlnBvMJk=
=jGLt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2007 10:28:49 UTC