- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 17:20:43 +0100
- To: "Alex Milowski" <alex@milowski.org>
- Cc: "XProc WG" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alex Milowski writes:
> While caching has been declared dead, this is a great solution
> for a user of a pipeline in that they can run two separate pipelines.
> One produces a set of documents that are put into the catalog
> or cache and the second uses that cache via an implementation
> defined feature.
Don't agree -- still wouldn't work for Richard, as I understand his
objection (consider again the stylesheet with an xsl:include), and if
it _would_ work, however it would work would be appropriate for
'fixing' my proposal to add a 'cache' port to p:group.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGFnNbkjnJixAXWBoRAr9wAJ4s6nuL8r/Mw47+w+WfSRfkcDpzMwCfR5bf
j/o7Xv+n4dvPFxKCa8n55/c=
=lf36
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 6 April 2007 16:22:02 UTC