- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 12:12:02 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Norman Walsh writes:
> Well, when I suggested it, I had in mind only that it would have the
> same effect as wiring up a dummy output to an input that is never
> read.
That's not good enough, I don't think -- in order to achieve
synchronisation, the input would _have_ to be read, and read _before_
the step did anything else!
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGFNmCkjnJixAXWBoRAly0AJ90TkzTsyfsN+jDOYpgEnDDgmNxOwCfaaEP
5kJghKiUeimcOg15IZ1onAQ=
=kvf7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2007 11:12:09 UTC