- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 08:18:53 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Dear, Fine so for this special purpose, I propose to add a p:map-ports map-ports = element p:map-ports { p:port+ } port = element p:port { attribute base-uri { xsd:anyURI }, (p:pipe | p:document | p:inline) } I know it is a strong requirement, but I want to start discussion to see where are the acceptable limits for every one The idea behind it to give to the component a mapping it could use for its URIResolver to link to accessible content that could be defined in the pipeline. The reason why, I let p:document and p:inline is that it could be useful to have such a way to make XProc aware of what could be in use. Any thoughts ? Mohamed On 4/2/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: > / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > |> | The other one caching of URIReference that says when you overload the > |> | URIResolver you can reroute the resolution to something in the pipe or > |> | outside > [...] > | Ok ! Fine ! So what is the scope of "caching" in this thread ? > > The ability for a step to refer, by URI, to the output of some > preceding step irrespective of whether or not its been serialized. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh > XML Standards Architect > Sun Microsystems, Inc. > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2007 06:19:01 UTC