- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:11:26 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 15 September 2006 18:27:54 UTC
In a similar fashion, I've taked the internal "flow graph" inside my compiler and generated a flat/subgraph view of use case 5.30 (which is faily complex). In my graph, viewports/groups/etc. have their inputs and outputs represented by vertices in the graph as they can be viewed as special kinds of components that handle meets/joins in the graph as well as other semantics. Also, I've left out all statically determined inputs as components can get those at any time. What is left is the flow of the data through the pipeline. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Friday, 15 September 2006 18:27:54 UTC