- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:12:34 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Norman Walsh wrote: > / Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say: > | Jeni Tennison wrote: > |> > |> Hi, > |> > |> In the example of <p:viewport> in the spec: > |> > |> <p:viewport name="encdivs"> > |> <p:declare-input port="div" step="step" source="port" > |> select="//h:div[@class='enc']"/> > |> <p:declare-output port="html" step="encrypt" source="result"/> > |> <p:step name="encrypt" type="p:encrypt-document"> > |> <p:input name="document" step="encdivs" source="div"/> > |> </:step> > |> </p:viewport> > | > | In the case of viewports, "//h:div" and "h:div" are equivalent. > > No, I don't think so. These are select patterns, not match patterns. I > would expect h:div to be the same as /h:div in this case, not //h:div. That's an issue we should discuss because I've always imagined them as match patterns. --Alex Milowski
Received on Tuesday, 24 October 2006 15:13:21 UTC