- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:23:26 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
I'd like to note that the following should be equivalent in our language: <p:step name="test" type="p:xslt"> <p:parameter name="computed" step="somewhere" source="x" select="/doc/param"/> ... </p:step> and <p:group name="test"> <p:output name="result" step="inner" source="result"/> <p:parameter name="computed" step="somewhere" source="x" select="/doc/param"/> <p:step name="inner" type="p:xslt"> <p:import-parameter name="computed"/> ... </p:step> </p:group> Now, I like to make sure everyone agrees that these have the same effect in that the XSLT step gets the same parameter named 'computed'. Yes? Second, I wonder if it makes sense to note this in the spec? After writing this all out, it isn't necessarily compact and certainly motivates the user as to why we have such constructs. It also shows how parameters can be computed for a group of steps. We could add a note in the draft demonstrating this equivalence. --Alex Milowski
Received on Friday, 20 October 2006 15:23:40 UTC