- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:53:54 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Norman Walsh wrote: > / Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say: > | Surprisingly, you can do this: > | > | <p:viewport name="crazy"> > | <p:declare-input port="e" step="other" source="result" > | select="/doc/x"/> > | <p:declare-output port="replacement" step="crazy" source="e"/> > | > | <p:step name="a" type="special"> > | <p:input port="document" step="outside" source="result"/> > | </p:step> > | > | </p:viewport> > | > | In this case, the viewport iterates over the matching 'x' subtrees > | in the document but doesn't replace them. > | > | The contained step 'a' should be executed as many times as there > | are 'x' subtrees but it doesn't use as input anything in the > | viewport and doesn't contribute to the viewport's output. > | > | From and input/output graph flow, it isn't in connected to the viewport > | in anyway. > | > | Should we allow this kind of step in iteration (i.e. viewport or > | foreach)? > > I don't see why not. I don't even see how to prevent it if we wanted > to. One constraint that would make this invalid is: "Steps inside iterations must be traceable to the subject of the iteration." --Alex Milowski
Received on Monday, 2 October 2006 23:54:07 UTC