- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 19:26:42 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 5/14/06, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> wrote: > > 1. The language (conditionals and other standard components that > > expose an XPath expression) uses XPath 2.0. > > I can live with 2.0 being the only choice but I think others can't. Same here. Is there anyone here who couldn't live with XPath 2.0 being the only choice? I would not think that we get a consensus on an option where we use "just XPath 2.0", but I feel like the question has to be asked anyway. Alex -- Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source): http://www.orbeon.com/blog/
Received on Thursday, 18 May 2006 02:26:57 UTC