- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:29:46 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Norman Walsh wrote: > / Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say: > | Obviously, with multiple inputs and outputs, this becomes more > | complicated. > > But it's all syntactic sugar, yes? You could, in principle, "unwrap" > all that nesting and build a more complex looking pipeline that did > the same thing, right? Right. > > | ...but if done well, this could be very, very useful. > > But are there any use cases in our requirements document that require > this level of complexity in V1.0? I think there are cases where the resulting for the user will be easier if we allow some kind of nesting. For the implementer, it is more work but I think it isn't an unreasonable amount of work. We need to get further along to determine this. I just wanted to register this as something we should consider at the appropriate time. -- --Alex Milowski
Received on Thursday, 11 May 2006 21:29:55 UTC