- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:16:56 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 7/20/06, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
> I had something like this in mind:
>
> <p:pipeline>
> ...
>
> <p:pipeline name="somecommonsteps">
> ...
> </p:pipeline>
>
> <p:choose>
> <p:when>
> <p:step kind="somecommonsteps">
> ...
> </p:step>
> <p:step kind="postproc"/>
> </p:when>
> <p:otherwise>
> <p:step kind="somecommonsteps">
> ...
> </p:step>
> </p:otherwise>
> </p:choose>
Norm,
OK, I see. The only thing I would have against pipelines declared
inside pipelines ("inner pipelines") is that I haven't seen so far use
cases that would require inner pipelines, and in the absence of such
use cases my preference is to keep this construct out of the language
for that sake of simplicity.
Alex
--
Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source):
http://www.orbeon.com/blog/
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2006 02:17:00 UTC