Re: Naming steps or naming outputs

Rui Lopes wrote:
> Alex Milowski wrote:
>>> Or did you thought on allowing extensions to be possible to use other 
>>> than steps? Am I missing something?
>>
>>
>> I'm not sure I understand the question.
> 
> When talking about "extension elements" I imagined allowing different 
> extensions to the language, as in language constructs other than just 
> steps (e.g. "while" constructs).

Yes.

In fact, this kind of construct would be essential to adding such things.

--Alex Milowski

Received on Monday, 10 July 2006 16:01:46 UTC