- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:43:44 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Rui Lopes wrote: > Alex Milowski wrote: >> Much like in XSLT, in smallx I added an extension-element-prefixes >> attribute on the root pipe element. This allows the compiler to know >> whether it has a step it doesn't understand. That is, if the namespace >> associated with that prefix is the same as the namespace as the >> unknown step, it can "halt and catch fire" on that step. > > Maybe if the attribute is something like step-element-prefixes (and not > general "extension" elements) the same semantics of p:step can be > achieved (orhaving a p:is-step attribute added to the non-standard > components to flag the same behavior). Right. > > Or did you thought on allowing extensions to be possible to use other > than steps? Am I missing something? I'm not sure I understand the question. --Alex Milowski
Received on Monday, 10 July 2006 15:44:08 UTC