- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 15:59:28 +0000
- To: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alessandro Vernet writes:
> 3. The make the discussion easier in this working group, we should
> agree on a common vocabulary and come up with a set of definitions
> sooner than later. For the sake of this list, we will use the
> following vocabulary. The "language" refers to the XML Processing
> Language. A specific file in the language is referred to as a
> "process". The language allows the use of "XML processors" like XSLT,
> W3C schema validation, SOAP call. A specific call to an XML processor
> in a process is an "operation".
I agree we'll need a standard terminology sooner or later. For what
it's worth in the past I've used
'pipeline' for the thing itself,
'pipeline document' for an XML document in the 'pipeline language',
'component' for the thing that carries out a '(pipeline) step'.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDvUJgkjnJixAXWBoRAh5mAJ403ONRkjW/jrHl427EvcMvct+nhwCdENty
QSsDYQadgy12Mos83W8Rkp0=
=4JuO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2006 15:59:57 UTC