- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:58:53 +0100
- To: "XProc WG" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
It seems that it still apply to that draft and to the alternate On 11/27/06, Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear, > > In 2.1 > 'subpiplines' instead of 'subpipelines' > > In 3.6 > 'Evaulated' instead of 'Evaluated' > 'inherted' instead of 'inherited' > > In 4.2.4.1 > The production > The name attribute must be a QName, a single asterisk (*), or a > string of the form *:NCName or NCName:*. > > is not enough clear (same problem in XPath 2.0) > maybe should use > > <emph><code>NCName1</code></emph><code>:*</code> > <code>*:</code><emph><code>NCName2</code></emph> > > > > In D 1.3 > 'XIinclude' instead of 'XInclude' > > > In RNC the wildcard are missing for p:parameter/@name and > p:import-parameter/@name > > > XPath is referenced a lot of time but doesn't appear in Reference > > Regards > > Mohamed > -- > Innovimax SARL > Consulting, Training & XML Development > 9, impasse des Orteaux > 75020 Paris > Tel : +33 8 72 475787 > Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 > http://www.innovimax.fr > RCS Paris 488.018.631 > SARL au capital de 10.000 € > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Friday, 22 December 2006 16:59:00 UTC