- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:28:48 +0000
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I am sort of OK with this as far as it goes, but had not thought that we should depend on names so much. That is, the rules I had in mind were more along the lines of A step with only one unspecified input, preceded or within a step/container with only one port available for binding, defaults to that input being piped from that port But that doesn't manage the defaulting of the pipeline to the first step very well in many cases, including your example. . . My earlier suggestions about this had depended on a notion of 'primary' inputs and outputs. . . But no such notion is currently defined. I feel like it might be useful in other ways. . . Hmm. We do after all _control_ the names of all the built-in components. . . ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQFFiowQkjnJixAXWBoRAkNdAJY0vVaLrnhxDsxRuZR0TIzUWHpNAJ0ctVnb 92FlyhwnPrT/6WZk8zrVZw== =5dyB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 21 December 2006 13:31:13 UTC