Re: Source without a step

/ Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk> was heard to say:
|> Option 1: It's an error and we come back to it later when we're
|> talking about abbreviations.
|
| That's what I was expecting.

Ok.

|> Option 4: The "result" port of the nearest "upstream" step that has
|> an output port named "result". It's an error if no such step exists.
|
| Noooooo!  Far too confusing.  If distant ports can be picked up like
| this, then inserting a step far away can change the plumbing.

Agreed.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.