- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:02:43 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87sljfpoto.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com> was heard to say: | That would be an error that the XML validator could catch. No extra code | to write, you get that for free by writing a DTD or Schema. That was a | significant part of what I was saying. Well, I expect to publish a RELAX NG grammar that'll catch the former error too :-) | I don't feel that it is "bending" anything. This is a straightforward | design decision. I am guided by Maler & ElAndaloussi as well | as Rubinsky on this. Well, I won't attempt to speak for Maler et. al., but we now have validation technologies that are perfectly capable of supporting the validation we need so I'm not sure what design principle you're applying. Input = HrefInput | SourceInput | HereInput HrefInput = element source { attribute href { xsd:anyURI } ... } SourceInput = element source { attribute source { text } ... } HereInput = element source { ... anyElement+ } Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh XML Standards Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 29 August 2006 15:02:32 UTC