Re: Naming

I really prefer your suggestion Jeni, because it open the possibility to
document an input/output without conflicting with the here content
like that
<pipeline name="ex1">
    ...
    <output name="result">
      <documentation>This is the result of the pipeline ex1</documentation>
      <pipe>
        <mydoc xmlns="">...</mydoc>
      </pipe>
    </output>
</pipeline>

Regards

Mohamed

On 8/16/06, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote:
>
>
> I'd actually intended 'here' documents to be nested inside the <pipe>.
> In a <step>, they have to be, in order to indicate which port the 'here'
> document is associated with:
>
> <step kind="xslt" name="transform">
>    <pipe to="source" from="validated!result" />
>    <pipe to="stylesheet">
>      <xsl:stylesheet ...>...</xsl:stylesheet>
>    </pipe>
> </step>
>
> and I think it would be best to avoid having <pipe> work differently
> within <step>s from how it does within <input>/<output>. So I'd suggest
> we do 'here' documents for outputs with:
>
> <pipeline name="ex1">
>     ...
>     <output name="result">
>       <pipe>
>         <mydoc xmlns="">...</mydoc>
>       </pipe>
>     </output>
> </pipeline>
>
> (I'm all in favour of 'here' documents for outputs: I think it's
> essential for <choose>.)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeni
> --
> Jeni Tennison
> http://www.jenitennison.com
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €