- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:23:33 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Alex, On 8/8/06, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> wrote: > > - @save="URI": saves the selected documents with the base URI supplied > > If this is for debugging purposes, I'd say that implementors have > an easy handle (e.g. step-name!port ) with which a user can specify > that they'd like that input/output saved for debugging inspection. > > So, maybe we don't need this right now. I agree. > > - @wrap="QName": wraps the documents into a single document > > This could be very useful. The implementation cost seems low to > me. Yes, indeed. > I really like this idea. This also gives us a way to use > "here" documents to specify static outputs. > > The use case for static outputs is where you have many different > pipelines that need to have the same input/output signature but > specific pipelines don't need to produce all outputs. If you > have "here" documents for outputs, you can place some kind of > "NOP" XML into that output: > > <pipeline name="ex1"> > ... > <output name="result"> > <mydoc>...</mydoc> > </output> > </pipeline> Are you saying that in this case, the pipeline output 'result' will always be the inline <mydoc> document, and that the data won't come from an step!port inside the pipeline? Alex -- Blog (XML, Web apps, Open Source): http://www.orbeon.com/blog/
Received on Wednesday, 9 August 2006 07:23:43 UTC