- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 22:38:53 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thanks for the summary, which I find soemwhat confusing however, mostly because I've missed several calls. I've read the minutes, and most of the intervening mail, but am still unclear how we got to such a verbose approach to inputs/outputs. I can't make much sense of the attributes used on the rellevant elts. (except href :-) Could you provide a complete example for use case 1, i.e. alternative to my proposal [1], please? And maybe an equivalent to my 'choose' example [2]? thanks ht [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2006Jun/0043.html [2] http://lists/w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2006Jun/0015.html - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEz8ntkjnJixAXWBoRAvN+AJsGC14kuAjHYwMwRDbr8CZaM31SdwCdEeu5 7w55GhhlGZPlE/nYBgMyxxA= =XhaY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 1 August 2006 21:39:03 UTC