- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 22:38:53 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for the summary, which I find soemwhat confusing however,
mostly because I've missed several calls. I've read the minutes, and
most of the intervening mail, but am still unclear how we got to such
a verbose approach to inputs/outputs. I can't make much sense of the
attributes used on the rellevant elts. (except href :-)
Could you provide a complete example for use case 1, i.e. alternative
to my proposal [1], please? And maybe an equivalent to my 'choose'
example [2]?
thanks
ht
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2006Jun/0043.html
[2] http://lists/w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2006Jun/0015.html
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEz8ntkjnJixAXWBoRAvN+AJsGC14kuAjHYwMwRDbr8CZaM31SdwCdEeu5
7w55GhhlGZPlE/nYBgMyxxA=
=XhaY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 1 August 2006 21:39:03 UTC