- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 07:53:08 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Norman Walsh wrote: > | I don't see how this is different than #3. The graphs are exactly the > | same. > > No, they aren't. In the first graph, two different components are run: > p:first and p:second, then p:foo. In the second graph, the same > component is run twice: p:copy and p:copy, then p:foo. > Ah... but I see that as two steps that use the same component. If they are the same *step*, then I agree with you. In the XML, they look like separate steps due to the fact that there are two different [p:]step elements. This is where I think using a concrete syntax fails us right now because we can't map it back to stable semantics that we all agree upon. A flow graph of some sort helps... but that might make discussions onerous if everyone has to draw a graph. --Alex Milowski
Received on Thursday, 27 April 2006 14:53:22 UTC