- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 22:13:44 -0700
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Norman Walsh wrote:
> | In the third example, the same step is shared amongst three append
> | steps. Here we have to decide on whether there is *caching* of results,
> | separate invocations, or user control of either behavior.
>
> No, I disagree. In this example, the timestamp component has three
> outputs. What those outputs are is the responsibility of the
> component. If timestamp has only one output, then you need additional
> p:tee components in there to make the pipeline sensible.
OK. Depends on how you interpret the drawing:
1. One output used three times.
2. Three outputs.
I was thinking (1) when I drew it but I can see how (2) can be
interpreted from the graph.
--Alex Milowski
Received on Thursday, 27 April 2006 05:14:01 UTC