Re: a standard error port

On Mon, March 2, 2015 12:57 pm, James Fuller wrote:
> as per ACTION: A-265-01
> (http://www.w3.org/2015/02/25-xproc-minutes.html#action01) ...
...
> On first pass an error port on an atomic step might be an odd beast in
> xproc. The p:exec step defines an errors output port which would help
> diagnose unexpected errors ... or partial errors where some processing
> was possible. Similarly, I could imagine an errors port from steps
> that are facade into other languages, such as p:xslt or p:xquery. But

Yes, just yesterday I was looking at how to get xsl:message output from
the XSLT in the pipeline in stf (https://github.com/MenteaXML/stf). 
Couldn't get it to work.

Regards,


Tony.

Received on Monday, 2 March 2015 14:37:54 UTC