- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 22:25:38 +0100
- To: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Cc: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen writes:
> HST wrote:
>> The phrase you mention, "reading and processing all external markup
>> declarations", is based on the second paragraph of the Entity Declared
>> Well-formedness constraint [2] in the XML spec.
>
> Yes, this is true.
>
> It does not, however, answer the question I had when I read the
> XPP spec and asked in the paragraph quoted above. The WG's
> answer appears to amount to "we don't know what they mean, and
> it doesn't matter because the XML spec used them before us without
> explaining what they mean."
I thought it amounted to "they have pretty obvious ordinary-language
meanings, which are assumed/articulated by context a bit throughout
the XML spec. without ever being explicitly defined there, so
referring to that spec. should be sufficient".
> You have a report from one reader (who has also read the XML
> spec) who found the unexplained usage confusing.
Fair enough. Would it be sufficient to add a note after the 3rd
para. of section 7 (or whereever that ends up after the rewrite that
is coming in response to another of your comments) as follows:
Note: For the distinction between 'read' and 'process' and how
processors might do one but not the other, see the definition of
'process' in the XML specification
[ref. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#dt-use-mdecl] and the sentence
immediately following it.
Trying instead of the above to actually reexpress what is referenced
there would, I feel, require huge amounts of technical terminology
from the XML spec to be explained in turn, and would be out of all
proportion to the importance of this sentence.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 21:26:06 UTC