- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 22:25:38 +0100
- To: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Cc: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen writes: > HST wrote: >> The phrase you mention, "reading and processing all external markup >> declarations", is based on the second paragraph of the Entity Declared >> Well-formedness constraint [2] in the XML spec. > > Yes, this is true. > > It does not, however, answer the question I had when I read the > XPP spec and asked in the paragraph quoted above. The WG's > answer appears to amount to "we don't know what they mean, and > it doesn't matter because the XML spec used them before us without > explaining what they mean." I thought it amounted to "they have pretty obvious ordinary-language meanings, which are assumed/articulated by context a bit throughout the XML spec. without ever being explicitly defined there, so referring to that spec. should be sufficient". > You have a report from one reader (who has also read the XML > spec) who found the unexplained usage confusing. Fair enough. Would it be sufficient to add a note after the 3rd para. of section 7 (or whereever that ends up after the rewrite that is coming in response to another of your comments) as follows: Note: For the distinction between 'read' and 'process' and how processors might do one but not the other, see the definition of 'process' in the XML specification [ref. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#dt-use-mdecl] and the sentence immediately following it. Trying instead of the above to actually reexpress what is referenced there would, I feel, require huge amounts of technical terminology from the XML spec to be explained in turn, and would be out of all proportion to the importance of this sentence. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 21:26:06 UTC