- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:55:26 +0200
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
On 11 October 2011 16:23, Norman Walsh wrote:
Hi,
> I was thinking about an extension to support this when it
> occurred to me that it can be done in standard XProc. I think.
> Anyone see any problems with this:
Good!
Personally, I would have passed the c:request document directly
as the input, supporting all HTTP methods, and decoding all HTTP
bodies in the response (single- or multi-part...)
Such a step would actually act exactly as a proxy around the
standard p:http-request, decoding the HTTP documents if any.
BTW, I've packaged the 4 steps a thttp://xproc.org/library into
a single one XAR package:
http://fgeorges.org/tmp/xproc-lib-0.1.0.xar
What do you think?
Regards,
--
Florent Georges
http://fgeorges.org/
http://h2oconsulting.be/
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 15:56:29 UTC