- From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 04:48:19 -0500
- To: <alex@milowski.org>, <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Cc: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
> >> 1. The c:headers in a c:multipart are for the multipart > >> message. > > > > Weird. Why not simply use c:request/c:header then? > > > >> There's no way to add any other headers and if there are any > >> other headers on a multipart reply, they get dropped on the > >> floor. > > > > So the content model of c:multipart is really (c:body)+, > > instead of the current (c:header*,c:body+), right? > > That seems correct to me. Yes, I think it should be just c:body+. Regards, Vojtech
Received on Monday, 11 January 2010 09:52:52 UTC