- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 21:49:39 +0100
- To: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Cc: XProc Comments <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
2010/1/7 Alex Milowski wrote: Hi Alex, > If you look at section 6.1 of RFC 2387, you'll see that body > parts only require Content-* headers. As of the current draft, > that is all we support and it is sufficient for transmitting > multipart/related content. Then I don't understand the current draft. Well, I don't understand it anyway. I've just checked again 7.1.10.2 <http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/langspec.html#c.request_body> and I realize I misunderstood the content model of c:multipart. It is actually (c:header*,c:body+) when I always thought it was (c:header*,c:body)+. And I think this is also what the following paragraph says (fifth para of this section): In a multipart message, the first set of c:header elements that are the children of c:request are the headers to the multipart message. The headers inside the c:multipart element are associated with a particular message part. Each multipart body is represented by a c:body preceded by some number of c:header elements. These preceding headers are associated with the body part in the multipart message. So before going further, is it a typo in the content model, is it me not understanding the content model or the prose, or is it something else? Regards, -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/
Received on Thursday, 7 January 2010 20:50:13 UTC